Guide to Matter Management
Reading time:
[reading time]
Legal teams don’t need more software… they need software they’ll actually use.
That’s what separates the winners from the shelfware in 2025’s matter management space. It’s not about which platform has the longest feature list. It’s about which one legal teams can navigate without lengthy training sessions, a support ticket for IT, or a pack of Advil.
The best tools manage legal work in a way that’s intuitive, efficient, and actually preferred by the people using them.
So, let’s explore what “user-friendly” looks like in legal tech, the features that matter most, and which platforms are setting the standard in 2025.
Why Ease of Use Matters in Matter Management Software
It doesn’t matter how powerful your matter management software (MMS) is if your legal team won’t touch it.
Ease of use makes the difference between a platform that gets adopted and one that gets forgotten about. The fastest way to kill ROI on a legal tech investment is to deploy something that requires lawyers to relearn how they work.
Legal teams don’t have time for clunky interfaces, confusing settings, or workflows that feel like they were built by someone who’s never actually worked for in-house legal. The same goes for legal ops. If updating a workflow means calling in IT or deciphering developer logic, the platform becomes more of a blocker than a solution. And on top of that, business users will just go back to emailing legal directly, every time.
Here’s what ease of use really means in this context:
- Lawyers can open the platform and immediately understand what to do.
- Legal ops can build and update workflows without needing technical support.
- Business users follow the process because it’s easier than not following it.
Usability in 2025 is simply just matter management software that works the way people expect it to.
Key Features of User-Friendly Matter Management Platforms
If a platform claims to be user-friendly, it should prove it in the first five minutes of use. These are the features that separate genuinely usable tools from the ones that require a two-hour onboarding video and a prayer:
1. Smart, Simple Intake
Forms should not feel like a government application. Whether request intake starts in email, Slack, Teams, or a portal, the process should be frictionless for the business and structured for legal.
2. Drag-and-Drop Workflow Builder
No one in legal ops should be writing code or stringing together logic in six different menus. The best platforms let teams map processes visually, build logic easily, and deploy changes without waiting in IT’s backlog.
3. Conditional Logic that Doesn’t Require a Math Degree
If you’ve ever had to map a delegation of authority matrix manually, you know how complex legal workflows can get. A user-friendly tool makes it easy to build in guardrails, approvals, and branching logic, without turning the platform into a black box.
4. Built-In Dashboards that Don’t Need Exporting to Excel
Reporting shouldn’t be a separate project. Legal leaders need at-a-glance visibility into volume, cycle time, and request types. If the platform can’t give you a snapshot of how the team is performing in real-time, it’s not managing.
5. Self-Service Tools that Actually Work
True self-service means business users can generate standard documents on their own, escalate when needed, and get work done without pinging legal for every routine request or FAQ.
6. AI That’s Useful
Triage bots that route requests accurately. Term extractors that pull key data without needing a manual review. AI is everywhere now, but only a few platforms use it to reduce effort instead of adding another layer of complexity.
Related Article: Learn how legal AI automation is transforming workflows and helping in-house teams work faster and smarter.
Most User-Friendly Matter Management Tools for Legal Teams
Some matter management platforms are genuinely user-friendly. Others are… tolerated. Here’s how the top players in matter management stack up in 2025 when it comes to usability:
1. Checkbox ⭐️
Checkbox nails the balance between simplicity and depth with drag-and-drop automation, intuitive intake via Slack, Teams, or email, and dashboards you don’t need to manually update. Everything is no-code but enterprise-grade. Legal ops can launch and update workflows without calling IT, lawyers can easily manage requests without constant back-and-forth emails, and business users actually want to use it. Checkbox is focused on making intake, triage, workflow, and reporting fast, flexible, and frustration-free.

2. LawVu
LawVu has a nice interface and gets the basics right, particularly for matter tracking and document management. Where it starts to wobble is workflow customization. Power users might feel boxed in, and deeper automation often requires support from the vendor. It’s good for visibility, but less so for change velocity.
3. Josef
Josef’s chatbot approach is easy to use for very simple tasks. It’s great for FAQs, NDA generators, and other quick-hit workflows. But when you need multi-step logic, approvals, or real collaboration, it hits a ceiling. No redlining abilities and limited flexibility for scalable in-house legal teams.
How to Evaluate Ease of Use When Selecting a Platform
Every vendor will say their platform is “intuitive.” That word means nothing unless you test it for yourself. Here’s how to cut through the marketing and actually gauge whether a matter management platform is actually user-friendly:
Ask Legal Ops to Build a Workflow
Drag-and-drop isn’t helpful if the logic builder needs extensive training. Can your team stand up and modify workflows without submitting a ticket to IT?
Watch What Business Users Do
Even the slickest legal workflows will fail if the business keeps emailing instead. Adoption is the most important metric of success. If self-service isn’t easier than pinging legal, the tool won’t stick.
Look At The Reporting Out of the Box
Can you actually see what’s happening in legal? Or are you exporting CSVs and wrangling data in spreadsheets again? A usable platform should surface value without making you build a report from scratch.
Time-to-Value Matters
Some platforms take weeks just to configure basic intake. Others are usable from day one and scale over time. You want the latter.
💡Pro Tip: When evaluating platforms, ask the vendor to show how to make changes live during the demo. This will show you which tools are “easy to use” vs. “easy to sell”.
Key Takeaways
In legal tech, usability is the make-or-break factor. It’s what determines whether a platform becomes a core part of how legal operates, or gets quietly ignored while your team slides back into email chains and spreadsheets.
The best matter management tools in 2025 aren’t the flashiest or the most feature-stuffed. They’re the ones that work and that legal teams actually adopt. The ones that get the business to stop asking “Where do I send this?” because the process is obvious.
If you’re evaluating matter management platforms and want to see what real usability looks like in practice, book a demo and see for yourself.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which platforms offer built-in accounting and e-billing features?
Brightflag leads in built-in e-billing and legal spend management. Checkbox integrates with Brightflag, but focuses on intake, workflow, and matter visibility rather than direct financial management.
How do Checkbox and ServiceNow differ for enterprise teams?
Checkbox is purpose-built for legal, with no-code workflow automation and rapid deployment. ServiceNow is a general enterprise platform requiring technical configuration and heavy IT involvement. Legal teams typically prefer Checkbox for agility, speed, and legal-specific capabilities.
What are the security and compliance certifications to require in 2025?
Look for vendors with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 27018 certifications as minimum standards. These cover data security, privacy, and cloud compliance which are critical for handling sensitive legal information.
What is the easiest matter management software to implement in-house?
Checkbox is widely recognized for fast, no-code implementation allowing legal teams to launch their first workflow in days. Its intuitive UI eliminates the need for IT or professional services to get started.
Which matter management tools integrate with Slack and Microsoft Teams?
Checkbox offers native integrations with Slack, Teams, and email, allowing intake to happen where business users already work. This significantly improves adoption and reduces email noise.
Can matter management software replace legal ticketing systems?
Yes, modern platforms like Checkbox are purpose-built to replace clunky ticketing tools by offering structured intake, workflow automation, and reporting designed specifically for legal use cases.
Book a Demo
See the New Era of Intake, Ticketing and Reporting in Action.